From f51636c193d032723c47343e39ff8296db350200 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lichao <lichao@aiotlink.com>
Date: 星期一, 29 三月 2021 18:04:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] change msg to use protobuf, add more msg type.

---
 src/shm_queue.cpp |   64 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/shm_queue.cpp b/src/shm_queue.cpp
index 8d90083..ffc7c21 100644
--- a/src/shm_queue.cpp
+++ b/src/shm_queue.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
  *
  * =====================================================================================
  */
+
 #include "shm_queue.h"
 #include <boost/uuid/uuid_io.hpp>
 #include <boost/uuid/uuid_generators.hpp>
@@ -47,10 +48,10 @@
 ShmMsgQueue::ShmMsgQueue(const MQId &id, ShmType &segment, const int len):
 Super(segment, MsgQIdToName(id), AdjustMQLength(len), segment.get_segment_manager()),
 id_(id)
-{
-}
+{}
 
-ShmMsgQueue::ShmMsgQueue(ShmType &segment, const int len):ShmMsgQueue(NewId(), segment, len)
+ShmMsgQueue::ShmMsgQueue(ShmType &segment, const int len):
+ShmMsgQueue(NewId(), segment, len)
 {}
 
 ShmMsgQueue::~ShmMsgQueue()
@@ -58,21 +59,16 @@
     Remove();
 }
 
-bool ShmMsgQueue::Send(const MQId &remote_id, const Msg &msg, const int timeout_ms)
+bool ShmMsgQueue::Send(const MQId &remote_id, const MsgI &msg, const int timeout_ms)
 {
     Queue *remote = find(MsgQIdToName(remote_id));
-    return remote && remote->Write(msg, timeout_ms, [](const Msg&msg){msg.AddRef();});
+    return remote && remote->Write(msg, timeout_ms, [](const MsgI&msg){msg.AddRef();});
 }
 
-bool ShmMsgQueue::Send(const MQId &remote_id, const void *data, const size_t size, const int timeout_ms)
+bool ShmMsgQueue::Send(const MQId &remote_id, const BHMsg &data, const int timeout_ms)
 {
-    // Test shows that in the 2 cases:
-    // 1) build msg first, then find remote queue;
-    // 2) find remote queue first, then build msg;
-    // 1 is about 50% faster than 2, maybe cache related.
-
-    Msg msg;
-    if(msg.Build(shm(), Id(), data, size, false)) {
+    MsgI msg;
+    if(msg.Make(shm(), data)) {
         if(Send(remote_id, msg, timeout_ms)) {
             return true;
         } else {
@@ -82,30 +78,34 @@
     return false;
 }
 
-bool ShmMsgQueue::Recv(MQId &source_id, void *&data, size_t &size, const int timeout_ms)
+/*
+bool ShmMsgQueue::Send(const MQId &remote_id, const void *data, const size_t size, const int timeout_ms)
 {
-    Msg msg;
-    if (Read(msg, timeout_ms)) {
-        DEFER1(msg.Release(shm()););
+    // Test shows that in the 2 cases:
+    // 1) build msg first, then find remote queue;
+    // 2) find remote queue first, then build msg;
+    // 1 is about 50% faster than 2, maybe cache related.
 
-        auto ptr = msg.get<char>();
-        if (ptr) {
-            MsgMetaV1 meta;
-            meta.Parse(ptr);
-            source_id = meta.src_id_;
-            size = meta.data_size_;
-            data = malloc(size);
-            if (data) {
-                memcpy(data, ptr + meta.self_size_, size);
-                return true;
-            }
+    MsgI msg;
+    if(msg.BuildRequest(shm(), Id(), data, size)) {
+        if(Send(remote_id, msg, timeout_ms)) {
+            return true;
+        } else {
+            msg.Release(shm());
         }
     }
-    source_id = EmptyId();
-    data = 0;
-    size = 0;
     return false;
+}
+//*/
+bool ShmMsgQueue::Recv(BHMsg &msg, const int timeout_ms)
+{
+    MsgI imsg;
+    if (Read(imsg, timeout_ms)) {
+        DEFER1(imsg.Release(shm()););
+        return imsg.Unpack(msg);
+    } else {
+        return false;
+    }
 }
 
 } // namespace bhome_shm
-

--
Gitblit v1.8.0